American and US Airways wanted a November 12 trial date to adjudicate the Department of Justice’s anti-trust lawsuit. DOJ first wanted a February date, and then when that represented a conflict with the judge’s calendar they suggested March.

My original guess about the DOJ suit when it was filed was that, regardless of the legal merits, the biggest risk to the merger was endless delays in the courts — companies can’t make long term plans or investments while they don’t know their futures. A March trial date would have meant the DOJ effectively would have won its anti-trust suit by default.

Today the judge in the case ruled to set a November 25th trial date, which means that the anti-trust claims will ultimately either be settled or adjudicated on the merits. In other words, the merger should not get killed simply through delays.

American’s statement on the judge’s decision:

“We are confident in our case and eager to get to Court. We are pleased to have a trial date that will enable us to resolve this litigation in a reasonable timeframe. We want the opportunity to compete together to enhance competition with the largest airlines in the U.S. – United, Delta and Southwest – and a number of fast-growing low-cost carriers. We look forward to making the case for the new American Airlines beginning on November 25.”

No matter what you think of the merger — and my preference has always been for American to remain a standalone carrier — this is a major development. While an anti-trust suit reduced the odds of a merger happening, a November trial date keeps the possibility alive.

    You can join the 30,000+ people who see these deals and analysis every day — sign up to receive posts by email (just one e-mail per day) or subscribe to the RSS feed. It’s free. Don’t miss out!

  1. Ed C. said,

    That ruined a lot of people’s thanksgivings. :D

  2. Thanh said,

    I really hope that AA and US Air will remain separate and US Air will have the 50% transfer bonus next year…I have never taken advantage of that promotion but always wanted to. But this might be a better news as if this drags on til March 2014, the promotion may not happen at all.

  3. DaninSTL said,

    Nice post. I agree with your take on this. I’m glad to see the judge set an earlier date as well. It’s one thing to kill a deal but it’s another to give it a life sentence.

  4. ed said,

    Yeah, I want this dead, but DoJ shouldn’t play dirty. As is, ruining Thanksgiving is amusing to me.

  5. Mike Reed said,

    I really, really want to see DOJ bring up the “US in oneworld” option as a counterpoint to the need for a merger.

  6. Rob said,

    The DoJ asking for a later trial date wasn’t “playing dirty.” It takes time to do the analysis carefully (and the DoJ is short-staffed right now because of the sequester). There’s a tradeoff, of course — delaying the trial causes problems for the merger — so the court shouldn’t automatically approve extensions. But the DoJ asked for the extension because they’re trying to do their job well, not because they’re “playing dirty” or anything like that.

  7. Ryan E said,

    Keep in mind 25 Nov is the tentative trial date. A 01 Oct date has been set for a status conference. Even 25 Nov leaves a lot to happen, and little room for delays.,0,880874.story

  8. Tom said,

    I have full confidence that the merger will go through as I have an undying belief that the US govt has been bought lock, stock and barrell by corporate America. Hope that all the AA ExecPlats enjoy those generous eVIPs while you can because Dougie is coming with his hatchet. :D

  9. DaveS said,

    It seems to me this enhances the prospects of a negotiated settlement.

  10. American And US Airways Get The Day They Want In Court | Pizza In Motion said,

    […] judge ruled today in favor of the airlines and a November start date.  I saw it first on View From the Wing, and then went digging for more info.  Terry Maxon writes an aviation blog for the Dallas Morning […]

  11. Steve said,

    Lets not lose sight that the Nov 25 date is just the start date, this could still go on for a while and kill the merger by attrition!

  12. Tyler said,

    How much are you compensated by American? You keep ignoring my question which I think is hilarious. You are obviously compensated by airlines and refuse to admit it…

  13. Gary said,

    @Tyler I am not compensated by American or by any other airline.

  14. JL said,

    Gary, don’t feed the trolls!

  15. Top Ten Credit Card Bonuses That Are About to Disappear | said,

    […] to close in third quarter of 2013. Legal wranglings will probably push that back, but there is a trial date set for November 12, so I expect a merger this […]

  16. Add A Comment

home | top

View from the Wing is a project of Miles and Points Consulting, LLC. This site is for entertainment purpose only. The owner of this site is not an investment advisor, financial planner, nor legal or tax professional and articles here are of an opinion and general nature and should not be relied upon for individual circumstances.

Advertiser Disclosure: Many (but not all) of the credit card offers on the site are from banks from which we receive compensation if you are approved. Compensation does not impact the placement of cards other than in banner advertising (we do not currently control the banner advertising on this blog). We don’t include all US credit card offers available on this site. Instead, I write primarily about cards which earn airline miles, hotel points, and some cash back (or have points that can be converted into the same).

Editorial Note: The opinions, analyses, and evaluations here are mine and not provided by any bank including (but not limited to) American Express, Chase, Citibank, US Bank, Barclaycard or any other company. They have not reviewed, approved or endorsed what I have to say.